The Formula to Win Job Interviews

Stop scripting, start preparing

If you search online for "types of interview questions," you'll find articles claiming there are eight, four, five, twelve. Make no mistake: there are only four. From these four, there is an effectively endless number of questions you could be asked — but they all fit into one of the four buckets.

If you've landed on this article hoping to flesh out scripted responses to imagined interview questions: a) sorry, and b) please don't do that. It's a bad strategy. If you prepare responses to imaginary questions, you've prepared for questions which may never get posed. It's a waste of time, and you'll panic when you get into the interview and never get the chance to deliver these amazing, overdeveloped, over-rehearsed answers.

The candidates who win interviews aren't the ones with the most scripted answers. They're the ones who understand what the panel is actually scoring, can read the question behind the question, and can pick the right example from their career to demonstrate the capability being tested. This article shows you what panels are actually scoring — and how to prepare for it.

The four question types

Every interview question — every single one — falls into one of these four types. Once you can recognise which type a question is, you know how to answer it.

That's it. Four question types. From here on, the only question is: which capability is the panel actually trying to score with this question? Because the question type tells you the format of your answer; the capability tells you the content.

STAR — structured storytelling

For behavioural questions specifically, every panel is looking for a STAR-structured answer: Situation, Task, Action, Result. STAR isn't a corporate invention. It's how humans naturally tell stories about their past — HR has just borrowed it, named it, and turned it into a scoring framework.

Here's STAR in real life:

Now here's the same structure dressed up for an interview:

Same structure. Same kind of story. The interview version has more detail in the Action and a quantifiable result — but it's the same shape. Once you can see that, telling STAR stories on demand becomes easy. (For more worked examples, see our selection criteria examples — twelve full STAR responses across nine capability families.)

How an interview is structured

The vast majority of well-run interview panels follow the same shape:

• Welcome and introductions. The panel introduces themselves and explains the format. Pay attention — they're often telling you the question types they'll use ("we'll ask some behavioural questions, then a scenario, then time for your questions").
• Opening overview questions. "Tell us about yourself," "why have you applied," "what do you know about us." Don't underestimate these. They're the only chance you have to set the framing for what comes next.
• A mix of behavioural and scenario questions. The bulk of the interview. This is where most of the scoring happens.
• More overview or yes/no questions. Often around eligibility, availability, or qualifications.
• Time for your questions. Always have at least two ready. We'll come to this.

From here, we could publish an exhaustive list of interview questions. There's no point. Every list is incomplete and most are repetitive. It's better to teach you about capabilities and personal attributes, because that's what panels are actually assessing — the question is just the vehicle for getting at it.

Whether you're a senior executive, a doctor, a front-of-house worker, a graduate, or anything else: panels are scoring the same nine capabilities. Humans, despite our smarts, only really have these. If you can't demonstrate capability across most of them, you'll struggle in any interview at any level.

The nine capabilities panels score

These are the nine capability families we use to organise selection criteria responses across our entire site. They're not drawn from any official meta-framework — they're our practical taxonomy for the work-related behaviours panels actually score on. (For deeper context on how these map to the official APS Integrated Leadership System and other Australian capability frameworks, see our selection criteria examples.)

Read the role description and the selection criteria carefully. Identify which of the nine the role most strongly emphasises. Then, in your preparation, build a small bank of strong examples across those capabilities — not scripts, just examples you can speak to fluently if asked. That's preparation.

The personal attributes

Capabilities are what you can do. Personal attributes are how you do it consistently. Panels test for both — usually at the same time, through the same questions.

If you can lead a team but you're not very kind, you won't be a leader for long. If you have change management knowledge but you don't act with respect and integrity, you won't get the buy-in change needs. You might solve problems theoretically but without resilience, how will you solve them in action?

The personal attributes panels are listening for — across the texture of how you tell your STAR stories, not just through direct questions:

• Honesty
• Fairness
• Integrity
• Accountability
• Agility
• Resilience
• Assertiveness
• Confidence
• Impartiality
• Open-mindedness
• Logical thinking
• Consistency
• Self-reflection

No one demonstrates all of these all the time. People demonstrate most of them most of the time. The ideal candidate, in any field, is the one whose capability examples are also threaded with these attributes.

Putting this into action: a worked scenario

With the four question types, the nine capabilities, and the personal attributes in mind, let's run a scenario.

Imagine you're a project manager. You manage projects for the construction industry. You're interviewing for a role with a government agency, where you'll manage infrastructure projects if you get the role.

You've taken time before the interview to think about what makes the audience particular. You know the agency has organisational values, serves the public, uses public funds, and operates under significant compliance obligations. The panel asks you a behavioural question:

"Tell me about your most complex project. What was it, and what did you do?"

Now — you don't tell them about the actual most complex project. The actual most complex project was the one where the foreman was sacked for poor behaviour, came to the site overnight, poured petrol on it and lit it on fire, you spent the next twelve weeks dealing with insurance, the police, the press, and a Coroners Court summons, the deadline was blown, the budget tripled, and the whole thing is still grinding through the courts.

That story demonstrates resilience. It demonstrates problem-solving under pressure. But it doesn't demonstrate much else — and the panel only has limited interview time to score you across as many capabilities as possible.

Instead, you tell them about the time you were sub-contracted on a government roads upgrade. It was hard because of the diverse stakeholders involved — local government, state transport authority, residents, environmental impact assessors. You got it done on time, on budget, and the relationships you built sustained you into a follow-on contract. That story demonstrates:

• Collaboration — multiple stakeholder groups with different interests
• Expertise — relevant to the government audience you're now interviewing with
• Leadership — of self, of others, in projects
• Communication — written and verbal across multiple stakeholder types
• Organisational skills — on time, on budget
• Problem solving — navigating competing requirements
• Strategic thinking — building toward the follow-on contract
• Adaptability — accommodating different stakeholder needs
• Most of the personal attributes

This pattern repeats across every interview, in every field. The arson story would have demonstrated two capabilities at most. The roads-upgrade story demonstrates eight. Same candidate, same career, same hour of interview time — but one example creates eight times the opportunity for the panel to mark you favourably.

Consider your audience: who are they?

Before any interview, spend ten minutes thinking carefully about the kinds of problems and challenges the specific organisation faces. Different organisations need different patterns of capability, and tailoring your examples to their reality is the difference between "good candidate" and "made for this role."

• A new organisation? They have no settled processes, compliance issues, growth pains. They need adaptability, problem-solving, and the kind of person who can build structure where none exists.
• A global organisation? Geographically spread teams, digital systems are critical, each country has unique rules. They need cross-cultural communication, asynchronous collaboration, and digital fluency.
• Government? Strict regulation, embedding change is hard, budgetary constraints, public accountability. They need integrity, stakeholder navigation, and patience with process.
• A small business? All-rounders are valuable, staffing is hard, profit margins are thin, competition is fierce. They need versatility, resilience, and someone who can wear multiple hats.
• A regulated industry (banking, healthcare, aged care)? Compliance, reporting, scrutiny. They need attention to detail, integrity, and the ability to make sound decisions when someone is watching.

Once you've identified the audience pattern, you can pre-select which examples from your career to lead with. You're not changing what you've done — you're choosing which slice of it best speaks to the particular audience.

2026: virtual interviews and what's changed

Most interviews in 2026 — particularly in the public sector, healthcare, and corporate Australia — happen on Microsoft Teams or Zoom, not in person. The methodology of the four question types and the nine capabilities is identical. But the medium changes a few things worth preparing for.

• Eye contact is harder. Look at the camera, not at the panel members on screen. Practise this before the interview — it's surprisingly unnatural at first.
• Non-verbal cues land less reliably. Gesture less, smile more deliberately, and pause for half a beat longer than you would in person. Lag eats subtle cues.
• Setup matters. A neutral background, decent lighting from in front of you (not behind), and a clean audio source. Bad lighting and an echoing room cost you marks the panel doesn't consciously register.
• Some agencies use AI-screened video interviews at the first stage — recorded responses to set questions, sometimes scored by automated systems. The four question types still apply. The difference: you don't have a panel reading your non-verbal cues, so over-deliver on clarity, structure and pacing.
• The "panel asking questions you can't see them all reacting to" problem. When all three faces are on a single screen, you can't read who's leading or who's about to follow up. Don't try. Treat your answer as if you're addressing the question directly, then pause and let the panel direct the next move.

Common interview pitfalls

The patterns we see most often when coaching clients through interview preparation. Each is fixable.

The "why me, why this, why now" framework

When you start preparing for any interview, the single most useful thing you can do is sit down with a blank page and answer three questions:

If you can answer these three honestly and specifically, most interview questions become easy. The opening overview becomes a clear two-minute story. Behavioural questions become opportunities to evidence the "why me" claim. Scenario questions become a chance to show the judgement that makes you suited to "why this." And the final "do you have questions for us?" becomes natural — because if you're clear on "why this," you'll have real questions.

In summary

Take five things into your next interview:

• The four question types — behavioural, overview, scenario, yes/no
• STAR responses for behavioural questions, told as natural human stories
• The nine capabilities panels are scoring
• The personal attributes that thread through how you tell those stories
• Why me, why this, why now

And one final question worth asking yourself, perhaps the most important one: where do all of these meet in the middle, if I were the one interviewing candidates for this role? Get inside the panel's head. Once you can see the interview from their side, your own answers will land differently.

Between now and your interview: practise telling your stories aloud, refine your "why me, why this, why now," and trust that you've prepared for the format rather than the questions. Happy hunting.

Read more

---